comments for Long-term Calamity vs. Short-sighted Denialists

My Graduation Thesis is bout the how the multinational corporations in developing countries affect the nature environment and economic environment at the same time, from all the research I did; I found that for some of the companies, the profit they brought is even smaller than the damage they did.
Now it is a hot topic in China about the greenhouse gas emissions. In my opinion, that it is kind of long-term loan, we are borrowing nature resources in the future and using it now. At the end, we need to pay back anyway, the point is can we create the enough benefit to pay the interest.
For most of the developing countries, such as India, Brazil, and China, greenhouse gas emissions is unavoidable. There are millions of people is living on the industries which are highly related to greenhouse gas.
I am not saying the developing countries don’t have duty to the environmental problems. In fact, as what I mentioned before, it is a hot topic in China now. We are working on it.
But on the other side, the developing countries have not enjoyed the 100 year fossil fuel orgy that the developed world has enjoyed and exploited to grow their economies. For this reason, it is unfair for the US or Europe to dictate the means by which the developing world chooses to stimulate their growth.
Every country has duty to global environment. But you can’t ask developing countries to pay the interest of developed countries.